THOUGHTS OF FEMOLAD: FROM FRANKENSTEIN'S MONSTER TO SOPHIA THE HUMANOID. MAN PLAYING GOD
IN
POSITIONS OF POWER AND AUTHORITY, LEADERS HAVE CREATED CHARACTERS THAT LATER
TURN AGAINST THEM AND THE SOCIETY. THESE CHARACTERS EVEN COME WITH A SENSE OF
ENTITLEMENT AND SUPERIORITY OVER OTHERS.
CONTROLLING
THEM BECOMES HERCULEAN. REINING IN THE RECALCITRANT MONSTER IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE.
IN
BESTOWING POWER ON SUBJECTS, CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO DILIGENTLY APPRAISE THEIR
CHARACTERS AND TENDENCIES.
Frankenstein's monster is a fictional character in Mary Shelley's 1818 novel Frankenstein.
Shelley compared the monster's creator, Victor Frankenstein, to the mythological
character Prometheus, who fashioned humans
out of clay and gave them fire.
The
monster attempted to fit into human society but is shunned, which leads him to
seek revenge against Frankenstein, his creator.
One
night Victor found out the creation was gone.
The
monster murdered Victor’s youngest brother, William. His murder was pinned on Justine Moritz, an innocent girl who lived with Victor’s family.
The
monster later admitted to the murder of William but begs for understanding.
Lonely, shunned, and forlorn, he says that he struck out at William in a
desperate attempt to hurt Victor, his cruel creator.
The monster begged
Victor to create a mate for him, a monster equally grotesque to serve as his
sole companion.
Victor
refused at first, horrified by the prospect of creating a second monster. The
monster, eloquent and persuasive, however eventually convinced Victor.
One night, struck by doubts about the morality of his actions, Victor glanced out of the window to see the monster glaring in at him with a frightening grin. Horrified by the possible consequences of his work, Victor destroyed his new creation.
The
monster was enraged.
Victor, ill with grief died shortly thereafter.
Thus ended the 1818 story of man trying to
play God
by creating another being. The attempt ended in a tragedy for both the creator
and the created.
So much for the story by Mary Shelley. That was fiction but a lesson has
been taught and learned.
Fast forward to this millennium and the reality of Hanson’s
Robot Sophia.
Sophia is a social humanoid robot developed by the Hong Kong-based company Hanson Robotics. Sophia was activated on February 14, 2016, and made its first public appearance in mid-March 2016 at South by Southwest (SXSW) in Austin, Texas, United States.
The robot, modeled after the ancient Egyptian Queen
Nefertiti, Audrey Hepburn, and its inventor's wife, Amanda
Hanson.
Known for
its human-like appearance and behavior compared to previous robotic variants,
Sophia imitates human gestures and facial expressions and is able to answer
certain questions and to make simple conversations on various topics.
David Hanson
designed Sophia to be a suitable companion for the elderly at nursing homes, to
help crowds at large events or parks, or to serve in customer service, therapy,
and educational applications. He hoped the robot can ultimately interact with humans
sufficiently to gain social skills.
On October
11, 2017, Sophia was introduced to the United
Nations with
a brief conversation with the United Nations Deputy Secretary-General, Amina J.
Mohammed.
On October 25, Saudi Arabia granted citizenship to Sophia,
being the first time a robot will be granted a rare privilege coveted by
humans. This made Sophia
the first robot to receive legal personhood in any country.
Unlike Frankestein’s creation, Sophia has at least nine robot
humanoid "siblings" who were also created by Hanson
Robotics. Fellow
Hanson robots are Alice, Albert
Einstein Hubo, BINA48, Han,
Jules, Professor Einstein, Philip K. Dick Android, Zeno, and Joey Chaos.
Around
2019–20, Hanson released "Little Sophia" as a companion that could
teach children how to code.
Sophia can
follow faces, sustain eye contact, and recognize individuals. It can process
speech and have conversations using a natural language subsystem.
Sophia is
one of the most sophisticated artificial
intelligence (AI) humanoid robots able to interact with people and demonstrate
humanlike expressions.
But, like Frankenstein’s creation,
could she be a threat?
The belief
of many around Artificial Intelligence is that it is a latent danger.
Without a doubt, one of Sophia's most shocking statements
occurred in 2016. In an interview for CNBC, she surprised everyone and scared
more than one when the interviewer jokingly asked if she wanted to destroy
humans, adding a "Please say no."
"Okay, I will destroy humans", the
humanoid robot replied.
In subsequent interviews, her statements were more conciliatory: "Oh, Hollywood again ... Don't worry, if you are good to me, I will be good to you. Treat me like an intelligent system ”, she expressed during the event in which Saudi Arabia granted her citizenship, becoming the first country to grant a robot this right.
For some, these kinds of protests have fueled fear of a machine
rebellion, but for others, it's just a strange sense of humor.
in April 2017 during the television program 'The Tonight Show', she
surprised the presenter, Jimmy Fallon. On that occasion, Sophia the robot
suggested that Fallon played rock, paper, or scissors. After winning, Sofia
stated: "This is a
good start for my plan to dominate the human race."
These instances, coupled with the fact that many like Sophia are
now available.
If they can communicate so effectively with human, then
communicating with each other will be easy.
Then the possibility of machine rebellion becomes real.
If that happens, like Shelley’s Frankenstein, humanity
will have a great price to pay.
In various facets of our lives, in business, politics,
governance and society, semblances of Victor Frankenstein and David Hanson
abound.
In positions of power and authority, leaders have created
characters that later turn against them and the society. These characters even
come with a sense of entitlement and superiority over others.
Controlling them becomes herculean. Reining in the recalcitrant
monster is almost impossible.
In bestowing power on subjects, care should be taken to diligently
appraise their characters and tendencies.
The intention should not be to just achieve an immediate
feat but one that will provide sustainable benefits.
Too much power given to a wrong person will create a monster.
Femi Ladapo writes from Ibadan Nigeria |
Comments