ONIDO STOOL: WHY GBOLAGADE BABALOLA SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AN ONIDO OF IDO.

 


 WHY GBOLAGADE BABALOLA SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AN ONIDO OF IDO.

Ido town was in the news recenrtly when the monarch on the throne of the Onido was suspended by the State government.

Many citizens of Ido are of the opinion that GBOLAGADE BABALOLA SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AN ONIDO OF IDO.

This magazine went into history and made some interesting discoveries. Here is what we found out.

The town called Ido today was founded by Agura, who was in the group that left Ile Ife with Oranmiyan to establish Old Oyo. On getting to the location in the forest, after consulting his Ifa priest he named the place Ido.

Agura left four children in Ido while the others migrated to other parts of the world, even as far as Trinidad. The four were Akinyemi, Dada Pero, Madam Alalade And Okanlawon.

Agura disappeared into the ground in Ido leaving four of his children to rule over Ido.

The appointment of an Onido then was through consultation of the Ifa oracle by the Oluwo of Ido.  Today for an Onido to be crowned, a meeting has to be convoked by the oldest man in the Agura Family. A mutually acceptable candidate will be nominate and presented to the Kingmakers. The name will then be forwarded through the Local Government to the State government. This is however subject to the consent of the Olubadan of Ibadan Land.

It is only then that coronation rights can be performed.

Akinwumi, from the Dada Pero line, was the first Onido of Ido. He reigned for many years.

He was succeeded by Madam Alalade’s son, Ige Eniayewu. Ige died in 1957.

Succession became a controversy between the Orobiyi family represented by Yesufu Ladapo and Akinwale family represented by Alimi Akinola.

A government panel of enquiry set up in 1958 to look into the issue sat on 5th February 1958, about 65 years ago.

The outcome of the panel was the CHIEFTAINCY DECLARATION made by the Chieftaincy Committee of the Ibadan District Council.  Here is the Declaration.

DECLARATION MADE UNDER THE SECTION 4(2) OF THE CHIEFS LAW, 1957, OF THE CUSTOMARY LAW REGULATING THE SELECTION OF THE ONIDO OF IDO CHIEFTAINCY

    I.        RULING HOUSE: There is ONE ruling house and the identity of the ruling house is AGURA.

  II.        CANDIDATE:        The person who may be proposed as a candidate by the ruling house entitled to fill a vacancy to the chieftaincy shall be: A MALE DESCENDANT FROM THE MALE SIDE OF THE RULING HOUSE.

III.        NUMBER AND IDENTITY OF KINGMAKERS: There are six kingmakers as underlisted:

1.   Balogun Onido

2.   Otun Onido

3.   Osi Onido

4.   Ekerin Onido

5.   Ekarun Onido

6.   Iyalode Onido.

 IV.        METHOD OF NOMINATION: The method of nomination by the ruling house is as follows:

The ruling house shall nominate at a family meeting to be summoned by the family head, a candidate tobe presented by the family head to the kingmakers who if satisfied as to his right of succession shall declare him appointed subject to the consent of the Olubadan.

   V.        CONSENT TO APPOINTMENT: The consent of the Olubadan of Ibadan is required to an appointment made by the kingmakers but such consent may not be unreasonably withheld.

Made by the Chieftaincy Committee of the Ibadan District Council which has been designated as the Competent Council by Western Region Legal Notice 22 of 1959 and signed by the Chairman and Secretary of the Committee this 28th day of July 1960.

I B AKINYELE

Chairman, Chieftaincy Committee, Ibadan District Council

WILLIAM A WARREN

Secretary, Chieftaincy Committee, Ibadan District Council

I O OMITOWOJU

Minister of Local Government

REGISTERED this 19th day of December, 1960

T.I OJO

For Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Local Government

The panel recommended Yesufu Ladapo Orobiyi as the next Onido of Ido. He reigned from 1959 to 1964.

It is evident therefore that

1.     Gbolagade Babalola is neither a member of or related to the Orobiyi Family or the Agura descendants of Ido.

2.     The prescribed procedure and due process by the 1958 chieftaincy declaration was never followed in his nomination.

3.     Kingmakers were not consulted in his nomination.

4.     Gbolagade Babalola does not have any lineage linked to Ido and hence no family house, royal or not, in Ido.

This much we have researched, discovered and reported.

The judgement is yours whether Gbolagade Babalola should ever have been an Onido of Ido.

Comments