BUA VS DANGOTE : THREE DECADES OF RIVALRY GOING AWRY

BUA VS DANGOTE

THREE DECADES OF RIVALRY GOING AWRY


The Kane and Abel Trilogy is the story of two men, who met only once, but it changed their lives forever. The trilogy consisted of three books: Kane and Abel, The prodigal Daughter and Shall We Tell the President.

They had only one thing in common. William Lowell Kane and Abel Rosnovski, one the son of a Boston millionaire, the other a penniless Polish immigrant The two men were  born on the same day on opposite sides of the world, their paths destined to cross only once in their ruthless struggle to build a fortune. 

Kane and Abel is a marvelous story, spanning sixty years of two powerful men linked by an all-consuming hatred, brought together by fate to save and finally destroy each other.

Aliko Dangote was born into a wealthy family on 10 April 1957 in Kano, Nigeria.

He is best known as the founder, chairman, and CEO of the Dangote Group, the largest industrial conglomerate in West Africa.

The Dangote Group was established as a small trading firm in 1977, the same year Dangote relocated to Lagos to expand the company. Dangote received a ₦500,000 loan from his uncle to begin trading in commodities, including bagged cement as well as agricultural goods like rice and sugar. In the 1990s, he approached the Central Bank of Nigeria with the idea that it would be less expensive for the bank to allow his transport company to manage their fleet of staff buses, a proposal that was also approved.


Today, the Dangote Group is one of the largest conglomerates in Africa, with international operations in Benin, Ghana, Zambia, and Togo.

Abdul Samad Rabiu was born and raised in Kano in the north-western part of Nigeria.

His late father, Khalifah Isyaku Rabiu, was one of Nigeria's foremost industrialists in the 1970s and 1980s. Abdul Samad is the founder and chairman of BUA Group, a Nigerian conglomerate concentrating on manufacturing, infrastructure and agriculture. He is also the chairman of the Nigerian Bank of Industry (BOI)

Abdul Samad Rabiu established BUA International Limited in 1988 for the sole purpose of commodity trading. The company imported rice, edible oil, flour, and iron and steel.[11]

In 1990, the government, which owned Delta Steel Company, contracted with BUA to supply its raw materials in exchange for finished products. This provided a much-needed windfall for the young company. BUA expanded further into steel, producing billets, importing iron ore, and constructing multiple rolling mills in Nigeria.

Years later, BUA acquired Nigerian Oil Mills Limited, the largest edible oil processing company in Nigeria. In 2005 BUA started two flour-milling plants, in Lagos and in Kano. By 2008, BUA had broken an eight-year monopoly in the Nigerian sugar industry by commissioning the second largest sugar refinery in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2009 the company went on to acquire a controlling stake in a publicly listed Cement Company in Northern Nigeria and began to construct a $900 million cement plant in Edo State, completing it in early 2015.

Unlike Forsythe’s main characters, Aliko and Samad come from two prominent families in Kano city.

The long-running feud between the two foremost Nigeria’s industries filled media headlines recently with each company accusing the other of sabotage, leading to calls for stronger rules and better enforcement against anti-competition behaviour by businesses.

Dangote Industries Limited (DIL) and BUA Group, two of Nigeria’s leading conglomerates, have reignited their over three decades old war for market control.

The feud began in 2017 when Dangote Group accused BUA of operating an unauthorized cement plant in Edo State, while BUA countered that Dangote was trying to monopolize the cement industry.

The latest allegations from Dangote Group accuse BUA of orchestrating a malicious campaign in the media by disguising as a concerned citizen

Dangote ad BUA Group have a long history of rivalry between them, as both companies had in the past been involved in running battles for market control in different sectors of the economy ranging from sugar, salt, cement, and fertilizer, among others.

 
The chairmen of the two conglomerate, Abdul Samad Rabiu (BUA Group) and Aliko Dangote (DIL), are from influential families in Kano State and are involved in the fierce control of the Nigerian economy.

BUA Group has accused Dangote of trying to stifle its major rival and being scared of Abdulsamad Rabiu and BUA Group

Dangote Group has accused BUA of orchestrating a malicious campaign in the media by disguising as a concerned citizen

BUA Group has responded to these allegations by reflecting on the group’s age long history of hostilities, difficulties, and alleged hindrances from the Dangote Group.

BUA Group has reaffirmed its commitment to innovation, integrity, and inclusiveness, saying the company’s history is marked by hard work, not entitlement.

DIL management explained that the same false report back “in 2016 was now being given a fresh false slant by one Ahmed Fahad purporting it to be a new petition directed to the attention of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Mr. Jim Obazee, the Special Investigator probing the CBN, and subsequently different blogs and social media platforms have been carrying variants of this arrant falsehood to the detriment of our corporate reputation.”

The statement said “attempt by the authors of this misleading allegation to give it a fresh life in the media is baffling as the two newspapers that were misguided into publishing it as advertorial then (2016) have since publicly apologised to the Management of Dangote Industries Limited in writing as well as retracted the advertorial in its entirety in their respective publications.

In response to Dangote’s allegations, BUA Group issued a comprehensive statement on Friday, November 3, 2023, reflecting on the group’s age long history of hostilities, difficulties, and alleged hindrances from the Dangote Group.

BUA Group reaffirmed its commitment to innovation, integrity, and inclusiveness, saying the company’s history is marked by hard work, not entitlement.

BUA Group expressed dismay at what it perceives as baseless blackmail and described Dangote’s allegations as cheap attempts at blackmail leveled against BUA by Aliko Dangote in a recent 7-page editorial following months of sponsored campaigns of calumny against them using third-party platforms.

BUA Group also stated that the antecedents of Dangote Plc in trying to outmuscle competition are not in doubt, and various cases abound within and outside the cement industry.

DIL re-emphasised that foreign exchange for its numerous projects were sourced strictly from Interbank Foreign Exchange market in compliance with the CBN approvals and that “Letters of Credit” were established for the construction of the various operational plants and for the purchase of heavy equipment and spares required for the take-off of the Dangote Cement plants.

The company further stated that funds invested in its expansion project across African countries are legitimate capital investments in those countries and the repatriation of FX in sum of $576 million so far has helped to boost foreign Exchange earnings in Nigeria and stabilise the FX Market.

In its response, BUA Group noted “It’s with a profound sense of responsibility and a heavy heart that we address the claims and very cheap attempts at blackmail levelled against BUA by Aliko Dangote in a recent 7-page editorial following months of sponsored campaigns of calumny against us using third-party platforms. To put things in perspective, it’s imperative to revisit history—a history not of rivalry but of resilience; not of enmity, but of endurance.

The company went as far back as 30 years ago narrating tales of purported underhand dealings by Dangote to snuff life out of the business. The company claimed it started with the presentation of dud cheque by their rival. “He gave us a Societe Generale Bank of Nigeria Cheque, which bounced upon presentation to the bank. Unbeknown to us, this was a ruse that would lead to a court-sanctioned freeze of our assets orchestrated by Dangote.

For three agonising months, our accounts were garnisheed, warehouses shuttered, and our spirit tested. Yet, from the ashes of deceit, BUA survived

It went downhill from there. The company accused the Dangote attempting to scuttle its plans for a sugar refinery in Lagos through those with political power.

BUA also accused Dangote of trying to run it out of the cement business after being issued licence by the Yar’adua government. “Our application to dock the floating terminal in Lagos met with resistance. We then decided to berth the ship at the terminal we owned in Port Harcourt. Despite this, we faced considerable pushback and it took the decisive intervention of late President Yar Adua, who directed that the Minister of Transport and the Chairman of NPA honour our right to contribute to the nation’s growth.

“But the hurdles didn’t end there. The drama intensified when Orwell Brown, a Deputy Comptroller General who was also an older brother to a Dangote Staff, launched a sudden strike, attempting to deport our vessel’s entire expatriate crew. It was a Friday that is forever seared into our memory, the shock of our expatriates rounded up, their confusion as they were shepherded onto a Dangote-funded one-way local flight from Port Harcourt to Lagos en-route Asia via Emirates.

“Upon hearing of what had happened, we reached out to Tanimu Yakubu, the then Chief Economic Adviser, who acted with the urgency that the situation demanded. His call to the Comptroller General of Immigration was a lifeline, and our expatriate team was brought back from the Emirates aircraft and not deported. The aftermath was swift action by the President, who ensured that such a misuse of power would not go unchecked. Deputy Comptroller General Brown, caught in a tangle of undue influence, admitted what he did to the Minister, and he was later dismissed.

As expected these accusations and counter accusations have drawn considerable attention but with both companies publishing dirt about each other, it remains to be seen how this would enhance their individual esteem in the public’s eye.

This points to Nigeria’s need for stronger anti-competition rules. The very nature of capitalism lends itself to anti-competition behaviour, this is why governments ensure market rules engender fair competition.

The growth of large-scale firms along with technological advances in industrial and agricultural production, improvements in transportation and communication networks and deflationary circles undermine weaker firms and encouraged corporation consolidations that attain greater economies of scale and scope.

 These conditions are gradually becoming prevalent in Nigeria as firms like Dangote Industries, BUA Group among others are increasingly play pivotal roles in the economies of Nigeria and other African countries.

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018 (the Act) is the main anti-competition law in Nigeria. The Act establishes the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) as the regulatory body. The FCCPC has far-reaching powers including the power to enter and search premises, summon and examine witnesses, call for and examine documents, and do such other things as it considers necessary for the effective performance of its functions.

The Act further empowers the commission to check abuse by a company with a dominant position in a market.

A company is said to abuse its dominant position where it charges an excessive price; refuses to give a competitor access to an essential facility when it is economically feasible to do so; and engages in an exclusionary act unless it can show that the technological efficiency and other pro-competitive gains outweighs the anti-competitive effect.

The punishment for contravention is a fine not less than 10 percent of its turnover in the preceding business year or such higher percentage as the court may determine under the circumstances of the particular case..

A critical examination of the claims and counterclaims by both BUA and Dangote indicate efforts to influence government officials to give aid or undermine a rival.

In other words, there is no way you can operate in these industries without selling your soul to politicians since they hold the powers to advance or cut you off.

As these two men fight, they are sending the wrong messages to the world on some of the critical sectors. How fast a president or a minister could pick your call is what really matters, and not the ideas you are bringing to the market.

Competition encourages individual businesses to innovate and find ways to work more efficiently resulting in gains like lower prices, better quality products and services and more choice for consumers. This rarely leads to the emergence of stupendous wealth amid mind-boggling penury.


For competition to stay healthy, it is the responsibility of governments to enforce rules that will make businesses behave in an acceptable way towards competitors and suppliers

Government must, as a matter of urgency, exert its regulatory authority, with high neutrality, before the two brothers destroy each other and their high-employing businesses.

The government has to intervene lest the three-decade old rivalry really goes awry.

ALSO READ:

LEGENDS OF THE ARTS: GRACE OWOOLA OYIN-ADEJOBI (IYA OSOGBO)

NIGERIAN POLITICS: ROLLING STONES AND CARPET BAGGERS

ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR: ISRAEL'S MOST WANTED THREE




Comments