ORONSAYE REPORT RESURRECTS TWELVE YEARS AFTER : THE IMPLICATIONS

 


ORONSAYE REPORT RESURRECTS TWELVE YEARS AFTER

THE IMPLICATIONS

Last Monday, Nigerians again woke up to what has fast become a norm. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has ORDERED full implementation of the Oronsaye Panel report.

The minister of Finance, Budeget and National planning, Zainab Ahmed, on Wednesday disclosed that the President’s approval has already been forwarded to the Head of Service and the Secretary to the Federal Government.

Oronsaye report is nickname for a document submitted to the Nigerian government in 2012 by a seven-man Presidential Committee on the Rationalization and Restructuring of Federal Government Parastatals, Commissions and Agencies. The report was followed by the Goni Aji Report which reviewed it, the White Paper released by the President Jonathan administration, the Ama Pepple White Paper and the Ebele Okeke White Paper.

The Oronsaye Report is named after Mr. Stephen Oronsaye, the former Head of Service of the Federation, who chaired Nigeria’s Presidential Committee on the Rationalization and Restructuring of Federal Government Parastatals, Commissions, and Agencies. The Nigerian government commissioned the report to address concerns about duplication, inefficiency, and bloated bureaucracy in the federal civil service.

The 800-page report recommended the elimination and merger of 220 of the 541 government agencies that existed at the time.

If the report’s recommendations are put into practice, over 100 heads of agencies and parastatals will lose their positions.

It proposed reducing the number of statutory agencies from 263 to 161, abolishing 38, merging 52, and reverting 14 to departments within ministries.

The report proposed conducting a management audit of 89 agencies to capture biometric features of employees, as well as discontinuing government funding for professional bodies/councils.

Furthermore, the Oronsaye report stated that if implemented, the government could save more than N862 billion between 2012 and 2015.



The breakdown showed that about N124.8 billion would be reduced from agencies proposed for abolition; about N100.6 billion from agencies proposed for mergers; about N6.6 billion from professional bodies; N489.9 billion from universities; N50.9 billion from polytechnics; N32.3 billion from colleges of education and N616 million federal medical center boards.

Jonathan’s administration formed a White paper committee, which rejected the majority of the recommendations while those accepted were not implemented.

In November 2021, the Federal Government established a committee to review the Orosanye report and its white paper, chaired by Goni Aji, a retired Head of the Federation’s Civil Service.

The second committee was formed to review agencies established from 2014 to the 2021, and it was chaired by Amal Pepple, another retired Head of the Federation’s Civil Service.

Following the submission of their reports, the Federal Government established another committee in July 2022, chaired by Ebele Okeke, a former Head of the Federation’s Civil Service, to produce a white paper on the reports.

However, at the presentation of the white paper to the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Boss Mustapha, in Abuja, Okeke stressed that it is pertinent to discuss with the leadership of the National Assembly to achieve the desired result, adding that most of the agencies created were products of bills from the National Assembly

Some of the agencies that will be affected include the following.

Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate to be scrapped and functions transferred to the Federal Ministry of Finance

National Senior Secondary Education Commission (NSSEC) to be scrapped and functions transferred to the department of Basic and Secondary Education in the Federal Ministry of Education.

National Agency for the Control of Aids (NACA) to be merged under the Centre for Disease Control in the Federal Ministry of Health.

National Emergency Agency (NEMA) to be merged with National Commission Refugee, Migration and Internally Displaced Persons (NCFRMI).

ALSO READ

POLITICS or CHOPITICS? ITS A CHOICE

Directorate of Technical Cooperation in Africa (DTCA) to be merged with Directorate of Technical Aid (DTAC) and to function as a department in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Federal Radio Corporation (FRCN) to be merged with Voice of Nigeria (VON)

The National Commission for Museums and Monuments to be merged with the National gallery of Arts.

The National Theatre to be merged with the National Troupe of Nigeria.

The National Metallurgical Development Centre (NMDC) to be merged with National Metallurgical Training Institute (NMTI).

Service Compact with all Nigerians (SERVICOM) to be subsumed to function as a department under Bureau for Public Service Reforms (BPSR).

Border Communities Development Agency (BCDA) to be subsumed to function as a department under the National Boundary Commission (NBC).

National Salaries, Income and Wages Commissioned (NSIWC) to be subsumed into Revenue Mobilisation & Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMAFC).

Public Complaints Commission (PCC) to be subsumed under National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

The Nigerian Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB) to be subsumed as a department in the Ministry of Arts, Culture and Creative Economy.

Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDHC) to be relocated to the Ministry of power.

National Agricultural Land Development Agency [NALDA] to be relocated to the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security.

National Blood Service Commission to be converted into an Agency and relocated to the Federal Ministry of Health.

Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM) to be converted into an Agency and transferred to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The Oronsaye Report faced several challenges and criticisms from various quarters, which hindered its full implementation. Some of the challenges are:

The resistance from the career civil servants, the National Assembly, and the politicians, who may perceive the report as a threat to their interests, influence, and patronage.

The legal and constitutional hurdles, which may require amendments to the enabling Acts and laws of some of the affected agencies and entities.

The lack of political will and commitment, which may result in the selective or partial implementation of the report, depending on the convenience and preference of the executive and legislative arms of government.



The limited scope and impact of the report, which did not address some of the fundamental issues affecting the cost and quality of governance, such as the size and remuneration of the political class, the infrastructure deficit, and the economic diversification.

Since the President’s fiat, reactions have been many and varied.

To some, a full implementation of a report 12 years after it was first made, which ordinarily may be described as outdated, especially because of how dynamic the society, economy, polity, technology and all facets of our national life has been may not be okay without thorough review and consultation.

Contrary to the assumption that the full implementation of the report would reduce cost of governance, with the current realities, the full implementation of the report will not substantially reduce the cost of governance as it does not reflect the current situation in the Public Service of the Federation.

The House of Representative expressed worries that a full implementation of 2012 Oronsaye report in 2024 will certainly throw up unintended consequences, implications and outcomes.

Professor Tunji Olaopa, a former Federal Permanent Secretary, said implementing the report will only be a “first leg on the required house keeping that government requires to align revenue with expenditure”.

Another issue worthy of note is the fact that many of the affected MDAs require legislation since there were laws that established them.

Dr Goke Adegoroye, in a recent interview identified three major roadblocks the implementation may face. They include politicians who are desirous/await political appointments/recognitions who may think shrinking the number of agencies will reduce their chances of board appointment. Another is fear of job loss by career civil servants in the MDAs to be abolished or merged. The last is the National Assembly whose members need to enact laws required for abolishing and merging the MDAs and the legal and constitutional hurdles, which may require amendments to the enabling Acts and laws of some of the affected agencies and entities.

One can only hope the fiat was well thought of and not a knee-jack decision like the subsidy removal which has boomeranged and which policy has been reversed behind the scene.

The report may require some tinkering with instead of using a twelve-year old solution today.

Comments